In Ford Motor Co. and World Rental Car Sales of Miss. v. Tennin, No. 2003-IA-02546-SCT, Ford was accused of multiple discovery violations during the pre-trial process. At trial, Ford got a unanimous defense verdict. In ruling on the post-trial motions, the Judge decided that the violations were so egregious that the Plaintiff was entitled to a new trial and the Court further awarded Plaintiff's counsel over $200,000 in fees and expenses for having to deal with the discovery issues. The Mississippi Supreme Court ultimately found that the Plaintiff failed to actively pursue motions to compel and get orders on the perceived violations. Without such orders, the trial court could not find a discovery violation that would warrant these sanctions. The Mississippi Supreme Court did find one violation of a discovery order by Ford and although it reversed the granting of a new trial, it remanded the case to the trial court for a determination of monetary sanctions that would be more in proportion to the violation of a single order.
Continue Reading...